History has repeated itself. As at the turn of the twentieth century, a call must go forth today to rally the faithful to expose doctrinal error to help preserve the Faith for the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The three living framers of the ICBI (R. C. Sproul, J.I. Packer and Norman Geisler) have issued written statements against Mike Licona’s view of the Bible.
Craig Blomberg’s new book reveals that there is a resurgence of neo-evangelical theology. Here’s an examination of his book and how his view of Scripture is incompatible with the historic view of inerrancy.
Did Matthew borrow a liberal-over-literal style from Roman biographers? In thirty references by ancient Roman writers to Matthew 27:45-54, every interpretation was literal and historical.
Dr. Joseph Holden responds to Michael Bird and Craig Blomberg. Using extra-biblical genres to turn historical narrative into fiction is the approach ICBI Article XIII rejects, and it opens a Pandora’s box.
Can We Still Believe in the Bible? The real answer to the question posed by Craig Blomberg’s book title is: Yes, we can believe in the general reliability of the Bible, but No we do not believe in its inerrancy, at least not in the sense meant by the framers of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy.
