Dr. Douglas Potter reviews Michael Licona’s Jesus, Contradicted and concludes that its “flexible inerrancy” merges two incompatible views: inerrancy and errancy.
Did J. I. Packer support Michael Licona’s view of Scripture? Bill Roach and Mike Licona recently exchanged views on YouTube. Here’s the background, with links to Bill’s responses.
Did God create Adam directly, or from a band of evolved hominids? Is Genesis 1-11 “mytho-history”? The Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics affirms that Genesis 1-11 is factual. Dr. Bill Roach discusses these questions in these recommended videos.
Michael Licona’s talk at the 75th meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society says the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy needs a facelift. Does it? Dr. Bill Roach explores the question.
Leaders of the International Society of Christian Apologetics explain why inerrancy is part of ISCA’s foundation, how ISCA differs from ETS, and whether the Chicago Statement needs revising.
The Gospel Coalition (TGC) recently announced that they are “hosting a series about the need to revise and clarify arguments in light of new hermeneutical and cultural arguments.” But should the Chicago Statement be revised after four decades of service?
