History has repeated itself. As at the turn of the twentieth century, a call must go forth today to rally the faithful to expose doctrinal error to help preserve the Faith for the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The three living framers of the ICBI (R. C. Sproul, J.I. Packer and Norman Geisler) have issued written statements against Mike Licona’s view of the Bible.
Craig Blomberg’s new book reveals that there is a resurgence of neo-evangelical theology. Here’s an examination of his book and how his view of Scripture is incompatible with the historic view of inerrancy.
Some have theorized that a liberal-over-literal style of reporting history by Roman biographers influenced Matthew in the writing of his biographical gospel of Jesus. This Roman Influence Theory (RIT) has been applied to four, six, or nine of the nine unusual events reported by Matthew in Mt. 27:45-54. This theory can be tested by examining the thirty or more refences made by ancient Roman writers to these contested events. In thirty such references, every interpretation of these events was literal, factual, and historical. No known ancient Romans show any awareness of or support for the RIT.
Contemporary Evangelical NT Genre Criticism: Opening Pandora’s Box? By Joseph M. Holden President of Veritas Evangelical Seminary Perhaps I should have titled my first article (“ICBI is Not for the Birds”) addressing Michael Bird et al critical approach to Scripture – “ICBI is not for the Mocking Birds.” After reading Bird’s response, one wonders what article he actually read and whether neo-evangelical critics take seriously...
Can We Still Believe in the Bible? The real answer to the question posed by Craig Blomberg’s book title is: Yes, we can believe in the general reliability of the Bible, but No we do not believe in its inerrancy, at least not in the sense meant by the framers of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy.
