Norman Geisler answers the question, “Does the Bible have errors?” His general argument is that it cannot err based on the nature of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This lecture is from the Veritas Evangelical Seminary 2014 National Apologetics Conference.
A response to William Lane Craig’s Neo-evangelical view of “limited” inerrancy. Is it true that inerrancy is not arrived at inductively but deductively?
The Neoevangelicals are attempting to dehistoricize the resurrection of the saints narrative in Mt 27. However, even though they differ on details, the Fathers surveyed here are unanimous as to the historical nature of this event. Not a single example was found of any Church Father who believed this was a legend.
Licona and his supporters, whom he lists as Darrel Bock, Dan Wallace, Craig Blomberg, Michael Bird, William Lane Craig, Jeremy Evans, Craig Keener, Lee McDonald, Kevin Vanhoozer, Robert Yarborough, and Gary Habermas, embrace a new kind of evangelicalism–a Neoevangelicalism–with regard to Scripture. It’s definitely not the biblical or traditional view.
The three living framers of the ICBI (R. C. Sproul, J.I. Packer and Norman Geisler) have issued written statements against Mike Licona’s view of the Bible.