Can one affirm inerrancy while believing the Bible has contradictions? Some Evangelical New Testament scholars are saying this is acceptable. Here’s a critique of this view.
Admitting the Bible has errors–regardless of how small–has huge theological consequences. So why are evangelical professors abandoning unlimited inerrancy? And what potential impact could this have?
There is growing confusion in the church over what the doctrine of inerrancy really means. How should we define it?
Roger Olson has taught at Bethel University and George W. Truett Theological Seminary. He claims the Bible is infallible but not inerrant. Here’s what’s wrong with this view.
The doctrine of inerrancy does not belong to any one denomination or section of Christendom. It belongs to the whole church.
